acme.sh vs LibreSpeed

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted reverse proxy & gateways options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
Featureacme.shLibreSpeed
CategoryReverse Proxy & GatewaysReverse Proxy & Gateways
LicenseGPL-3.0free
LanguageShellJavaScript
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM32 MB512 MB
Deploymentbinary, sourcedocker, one-click
GitHub stars★ 47,426★ 15,025
First released20162022
ReplacesCertbot

Why pick each one

Choose acme.sh if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Mature project with 47.4k GitHub stars
  • Written in Shell
acme.sh details

Choose LibreSpeed if…

  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • One-click install on common self-host platforms
  • Mature project with 15k GitHub stars
LibreSpeed details

Frequently asked questions

Is acme.sh or LibreSpeed better?

Neither is universally better. acme.sh has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are acme.sh and LibreSpeed free and open-source?

Yes. acme.sh is licensed under GPL-3.0 and LibreSpeed under free. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run acme.sh and LibreSpeed with Docker?

acme.sh: check the project docs for container support. LibreSpeed: yes.

Related comparisons