92five vs OpenProject
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted project management & tasks options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
92five
Self-hosted project management application
VS
OpenProject
Open-source project management and collaboration
| Feature | 92five | OpenProject |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Project Management & Tasks | Project Management & Tasks |
| License | ⊘ Proprietary | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | PHP | Ruby |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 2,048 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | — | ★ 15,794 |
| First released | 2020 | 2012 |
| Replaces | — | Jira, Asana |
Why pick each one
Choose 92five if…
- Released under the ⊘ Proprietary license
- Written in PHP
- Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Choose OpenProject if…
- Very feature-complete
- Good for classic project management
- Strong permissions
Frequently asked questions
Is 92five or OpenProject better?
Neither is universally better. OpenProject has the larger community, while 92five is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are 92five and OpenProject free and open-source?
Yes. 92five is licensed under ⊘ Proprietary and OpenProject under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run 92five and OpenProject with Docker?
92five: check the project docs for container support. OpenProject: yes.