4get vs PeARS
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted search engines options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
4get
Lightweight privacy-friendly metasearch proxy
VS
PeARS
Lightweight distributed web search you can host yourself
| Feature | 4get | PeARS |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Search Engines | Search Engines |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | PHP | HTML |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 800 | ★ 38 |
| First released | 2022 | 2017 |
| Replaces | Google Search, Bing | Google Search |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is 4get or PeARS better?
4get is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider PeARS if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are 4get and PeARS free and open-source?
Yes. 4get is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and PeARS under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run 4get and PeARS with Docker?
4get: yes. PeARS: yes.