WeeChat vs Openfire
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
WeeChat
Extensible terminal-based chat client
VS
Openfire
Real-time collaboration XMPP server written in Java
| Feature | WeeChat | Openfire |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Chat & Communication | Matrix & XMPP |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | C | Java |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal, binary, source | docker, bare-metal, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 3,366 | ★ 3,052 |
| First released | 2003 | 2004 |
| Replaces | Slack | Slack, Microsoft Teams |
Why pick each one
Choose WeeChat if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- Active community (3.4k GitHub stars)
- Written in C
- Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is WeeChat or Openfire better?
Neither is universally better. WeeChat has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are WeeChat and Openfire free and open-source?
Yes. WeeChat is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Openfire under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run WeeChat and Openfire with Docker?
WeeChat: check the project docs for container support. Openfire: yes.