FocusTime Tracker vs Toggl Selfhost Pomotodo

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted time tracking options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureFocusTime TrackerToggl Selfhost Pomotodo
CategoryTime TrackingTime Tracking
LicenseMITMIT
LanguagePythonRust
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM64 MB128 MB
Deploymentbinary, sourcedocker, source
GitHub stars★ 2,535★ 5,408
First released20152018
ReplacesToggl, HarvestRescueTime, Forest

Why pick each one

Choose FocusTime Tracker if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Active community (2.5k GitHub stars)
  • Written in Python
FocusTime Tracker details

Choose Toggl Selfhost Pomotodo if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 5.4k GitHub stars
Toggl Selfhost Pomotodo details

Frequently asked questions

Is FocusTime Tracker or Toggl Selfhost Pomotodo better?

Neither is universally better. Toggl Selfhost Pomotodo has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are FocusTime Tracker and Toggl Selfhost Pomotodo free and open-source?

Yes. FocusTime Tracker is licensed under MIT and Toggl Selfhost Pomotodo under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run FocusTime Tracker and Toggl Selfhost Pomotodo with Docker?

FocusTime Tracker: check the project docs for container support. Toggl Selfhost Pomotodo: yes.

Related comparisons