Browserpass vs Vaultwarden
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted password managers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Browserpass
Browser extension front-end for the pass manager
VS
Vaultwarden
Lightweight Bitwarden-compatible password server
| Feature | Browserpass | Vaultwarden |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Password Managers | Password Managers |
| License | ISC | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | JavaScript | Rust |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | binary, source | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,009 | ★ 65,100 |
| First released | 2016 | 2018 |
| Replaces | LastPass extension, 1Password extension | 1Password, LastPass, Dashlane |
Why pick each one
Choose Browserpass if…
- Released under the ISC license
- Active community (1k GitHub stars)
- Written in JavaScript
- Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
Choose Vaultwarden if…
- Extremely lightweight
- Works with official apps
- Easy to deploy
Frequently asked questions
Is Browserpass or Vaultwarden better?
Vaultwarden is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Browserpass if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Browserpass and Vaultwarden free and open-source?
Yes. Browserpass is licensed under ISC and Vaultwarden under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Browserpass and Vaultwarden with Docker?
Browserpass: check the project docs for container support. Vaultwarden: yes.