Utterances vs webmention.io
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Utterances
Comments widget powered by GitHub issues
VS
webmention.io
Hosted endpoint for receiving Webmentions
| Feature | Utterances | webmention.io |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Forums & Community | Social Networks |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | TypeScript | Ruby |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 32 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal, source | source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 9,696 | ★ 866 |
| First released | 2018 | 2014 |
| Replaces | Disqus | Disqus |
Why pick each one
Choose Utterances if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Mature project with 9.7k GitHub stars
- Written in TypeScript
Choose webmention.io if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Written in Ruby
- Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Utterances or webmention.io better?
Utterances is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider webmention.io if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Utterances and webmention.io free and open-source?
Yes. Utterances is licensed under MIT and webmention.io under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Utterances and webmention.io with Docker?
Utterances: check the project docs for container support. webmention.io: check the project docs for container support.