undb vs Luckysheet
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted office suites options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
undb
Private and self-hosted no-code database
VS
Luckysheet
Online spreadsheet component with rich features
| Feature | undb | Luckysheet |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Office Suites | Office Suites |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | TypeScript | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker, source | source, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 2,968 | ★ 16,650 |
| First released | 2022 | 2019 |
| Replaces | Airtable | Google Sheets, Microsoft Excel |
Why pick each one
Choose undb if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (3k GitHub stars)
Choose Luckysheet if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Mature project with 16.6k GitHub stars
- Written in JavaScript
- Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is undb or Luckysheet better?
Neither is universally better. Luckysheet has the larger community, while undb is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are undb and Luckysheet free and open-source?
Yes. undb is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Luckysheet under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run undb and Luckysheet with Docker?
undb: yes. Luckysheet: check the project docs for container support.