Unciv vs Waterfall

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted game servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureUncivWaterfall
CategoryGame ServersGame Servers
LicenseMPL-2.0MIT
LanguageKotlinShell
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM512 MB512 MB
Deploymentbare-metal, binary, dockerbare-metal, docker
GitHub stars★ 11,071★ 751
First released20182016
ReplacesCivilization VBungeeCord

Why pick each one

Choose Unciv if…

  • Released under the MPL-2.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 11.1k GitHub stars
Unciv details

Choose Waterfall if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Written in Shell
  • Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Waterfall details

Frequently asked questions

Is Unciv or Waterfall better?

Unciv is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Waterfall if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Unciv and Waterfall free and open-source?

Yes. Unciv is licensed under MPL-2.0 and Waterfall under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Unciv and Waterfall with Docker?

Unciv: yes. Waterfall: yes.

Related comparisons