Umami vs Pirsch
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted web analytics options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Umami
Simple, fast, privacy-focused web analytics
VS
Pirsch
Privacy-friendly, cookie-free web analytics platform
| Feature | Umami | Pirsch |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Web Analytics | Web Analytics |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | TypeScript | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 38,103 | ★ 1,027 |
| First released | 2020 | 2020 |
| Replaces | Google Analytics | Google Analytics |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Umami or Pirsch better?
Umami is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Pirsch if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Umami and Pirsch free and open-source?
Yes. Umami is licensed under MIT and Pirsch under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Umami and Pirsch with Docker?
Umami: yes. Pirsch: yes.