Twake Drive vs ZenTao
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted groupware options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Twake Drive
Open-source collaborative file storage and workspace
VS
ZenTao
Open-source project and team collaboration platform
| Feature | Twake Drive | ZenTao |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Groupware | Groupware |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | JavaScript | PHP |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 2,048 MB | 1,024 MB |
| Deployment | docker, source | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 980 | ★ 1,665 |
| First released | 2019 | 2009 |
| Replaces | Google Drive, Microsoft OneDrive | Jira, Confluence |
Why pick each one
Choose Twake Drive if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in JavaScript
Frequently asked questions
Is Twake Drive or ZenTao better?
ZenTao is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider Twake Drive if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Twake Drive and ZenTao free and open-source?
Yes. Twake Drive is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and ZenTao under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Twake Drive and ZenTao with Docker?
Twake Drive: yes. ZenTao: yes.