Trotto vs Sink
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted url shorteners options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Trotto
Open-source go-links for company shortcuts
VS
Sink
Serverless URL shortener with built-in analytics
| Feature | Trotto | Sink |
|---|---|---|
| Category | URL Shorteners | URL Shorteners |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Language | Python | Vue |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | source, one-click |
| GitHub stars | ★ 349 | ★ 7,000 |
| First released | 2018 | 2024 |
| Replaces | Golinks, GoLinks.io | Bitly |
Why pick each one
Choose Trotto if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Python
- Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Choose Sink if…
- Released under the MIT license
- One-click install on common self-host platforms
- Mature project with 7k GitHub stars
- Written in Vue
Frequently asked questions
Is Trotto or Sink better?
Neither is universally better. Sink has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Trotto and Sink free and open-source?
Yes. Trotto is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Sink under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Trotto and Sink with Docker?
Trotto: yes. Sink: check the project docs for container support.