Traccar vs wanderer
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted maps & gis options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Traccar
Open-source GPS tracking platform
VS
wanderer
Trail database where you can upload your recorded tracks or create new
| Feature | Traccar | wanderer |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Maps & GIS | Maps & GIS |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Java | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 1,024 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal, binary | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 7,563 | ★ 3,802 |
| First released | 2012 | 2026 |
| Replaces | Google Maps, Life360 | — |
Why pick each one
Choose Traccar if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 7.6k GitHub stars
- Written in Java
Choose wanderer if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (3.8k GitHub stars)
- Written in Go
Frequently asked questions
Is Traccar or wanderer better?
Neither is universally better. Traccar has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Traccar and wanderer free and open-source?
Yes. Traccar is licensed under Apache-2.0 and wanderer under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Traccar and wanderer with Docker?
Traccar: yes. wanderer: yes.