Traccar vs Valhalla
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted maps & gis options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Traccar
Open-source GPS tracking platform
VS
Valhalla
Open-source routing engine with multimodal support
| Feature | Traccar | Valhalla |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Maps & GIS | Maps & GIS |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Language | Java | C++ |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 1,024 MB | 8,192 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal, binary | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 7,563 | ★ 6,050 |
| First released | 2012 | 2015 |
| Replaces | Google Maps, Life360 | Google Directions API |
Why pick each one
Choose Traccar if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 7.6k GitHub stars
- Written in Java
Choose Valhalla if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 6k GitHub stars
- Written in C++
Frequently asked questions
Is Traccar or Valhalla better?
Traccar is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider Valhalla if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Traccar and Valhalla free and open-source?
Yes. Traccar is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Valhalla under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Traccar and Valhalla with Docker?
Traccar: yes. Valhalla: yes.