ToolJet vs UpSnap
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted automation & workflows options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
ToolJet
Low-code platform for building and automating business tools
VS
UpSnap
Wake-on-LAN dashboard to power devices on and off
| Feature | ToolJet | UpSnap |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Automation & Workflows | Automation & Workflows |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | JavaScript | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 2,048 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes, helm | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 38,306 | ★ 6,112 |
| First released | 2021 | 2022 |
| Replaces | Retool, Microsoft Power Apps | Commercial WOL apps |
Why pick each one
Choose UpSnap if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 6.1k GitHub stars
Frequently asked questions
Is ToolJet or UpSnap better?
Neither is universally better. ToolJet has the larger community, while UpSnap is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are ToolJet and UpSnap free and open-source?
Yes. ToolJet is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and UpSnap under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run ToolJet and UpSnap with Docker?
ToolJet: yes. UpSnap: yes.