Cryptee Sheets vs Luckysheet

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted office suites options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureCryptee SheetsLuckysheet
CategoryOffice SuitesOffice Suites
LicenseApache-2.0MIT
LanguageTypeScriptJavaScript
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM512 MB256 MB
Deploymentsource, dockersource, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 49,659★ 16,650
First released20212019
ReplacesMiro, FigJamGoogle Sheets, Microsoft Excel

Why pick each one

Choose Cryptee Sheets if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 49.7k GitHub stars
  • Written in TypeScript
Cryptee Sheets details

Choose Luckysheet if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Mature project with 16.6k GitHub stars
  • Written in JavaScript
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Luckysheet details

Frequently asked questions

Is Cryptee Sheets or Luckysheet better?

Neither is universally better. Cryptee Sheets has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Cryptee Sheets and Luckysheet free and open-source?

Yes. Cryptee Sheets is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Luckysheet under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Cryptee Sheets and Luckysheet with Docker?

Cryptee Sheets: yes. Luckysheet: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons