Cryptee Sheets vs WBO

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted office suites options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureCryptee SheetsWBO
CategoryOffice SuitesOffice Suites
LicenseApache-2.0AGPL-3.0
LanguageTypeScriptJavaScript
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM512 MB256 MB
Deploymentsource, dockerdocker, source
GitHub stars★ 49,659★ 2,627
First released20212013
ReplacesMiro, FigJamMiro, Microsoft Whiteboard

Why pick each one

Choose Cryptee Sheets if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 49.7k GitHub stars
  • Written in TypeScript
Cryptee Sheets details

Choose WBO if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (2.6k GitHub stars)
WBO details

Frequently asked questions

Is Cryptee Sheets or WBO better?

Neither is universally better. Cryptee Sheets has the larger community, while WBO is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Cryptee Sheets and WBO free and open-source?

Yes. Cryptee Sheets is licensed under Apache-2.0 and WBO under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Cryptee Sheets and WBO with Docker?

Cryptee Sheets: yes. WBO: yes.

Related comparisons