SHSelfHostIndex

Tina CMS vs Umbraco

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted content management systems options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
TI Tina CMS Git-backed content management with visual editing VS UM Umbraco Friendly open-source .NET content management system
FeatureTina CMSUmbraco
CategoryContent Management SystemsContent Management Systems
LicenseApache-2.0MIT
LanguageTypeScriptC#
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM512 MB1,024 MB
Deploymentdocker, sourcedocker, bare-metal, source
GitHub stars★ 13,714★ 5,224
First released20212005
ReplacesContentful, SanitySitecore, Kentico

Why pick each one

Choose Tina CMS if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 13.7k GitHub stars
  • Written in TypeScript
Tina CMS details

Choose Umbraco if…

  • Great choice on the .NET stack
  • Polished editor experience
Umbraco details

Frequently asked questions

Is Tina CMS or Umbraco better?

Neither is universally better. Tina CMS has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Tina CMS and Umbraco free and open-source?

Yes. Tina CMS is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Umbraco under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Tina CMS and Umbraco with Docker?

Tina CMS: yes. Umbraco: yes.

Related comparisons