Tina CMS vs TYPO3
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted content management systems options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Tina CMS
Git-backed content management with visual editing
VS
TYPO3
Enterprise CMS popular for large corporate websites
| Feature | Tina CMS | TYPO3 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Content Management Systems | Content Management Systems |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-2.0 |
| Language | TypeScript | PHP |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 1,024 MB |
| Deployment | docker, source | docker, bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 13,714 | ★ 1,200 |
| First released | 2021 | 1998 |
| Replaces | Contentful, Sanity | Adobe Experience Manager, Sitecore |
Why pick each one
Choose Tina CMS if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 13.7k GitHub stars
- Written in TypeScript
Frequently asked questions
Is Tina CMS or TYPO3 better?
Tina CMS is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider TYPO3 if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Tina CMS and TYPO3 free and open-source?
Yes. Tina CMS is licensed under Apache-2.0 and TYPO3 under GPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Tina CMS and TYPO3 with Docker?
Tina CMS: yes. TYPO3: yes.