Teable vs Carbone Document Engine

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted office suites options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureTeableCarbone Document Engine
CategoryOffice SuitesOffice Suites
LicenseAGPL-3.0Apache-2.0
LanguageTypeScriptJavaScript
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM1,024 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, sourcedocker, source
GitHub stars★ 21,635★ 2,087
First released20232015
ReplacesAirtableDocRaptor, Adobe PDF Services

Why pick each one

Choose Teable if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 21.6k GitHub stars
  • Written in TypeScript
Teable details

Choose Carbone Document Engine if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (2.1k GitHub stars)
  • Written in JavaScript
Carbone Document Engine details

Frequently asked questions

Is Teable or Carbone Document Engine better?

Neither is universally better. Teable has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Teable and Carbone Document Engine free and open-source?

Yes. Teable is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Carbone Document Engine under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Teable and Carbone Document Engine with Docker?

Teable: yes. Carbone Document Engine: yes.

Related comparisons