Teable vs WBO

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted office suites options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureTeableWBO
CategoryOffice SuitesOffice Suites
LicenseAGPL-3.0AGPL-3.0
LanguageTypeScriptJavaScript
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM1,024 MB256 MB
Deploymentdocker, sourcedocker, source
GitHub stars★ 21,635★ 2,627
First released20232013
ReplacesAirtableMiro, Microsoft Whiteboard

Why pick each one

Choose Teable if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 21.6k GitHub stars
  • Written in TypeScript
Teable details

Choose WBO if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (2.6k GitHub stars)
WBO details

Frequently asked questions

Is Teable or WBO better?

Neither is universally better. Teable has the larger community, while WBO is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Teable and WBO free and open-source?

Yes. Teable is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and WBO under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Teable and WBO with Docker?

Teable: yes. WBO: yes.

Related comparisons