SHSelfHostIndex

Backup wrapper nono Backup-rsync-time-backup vs Docker Volume Backup

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
BA Backup wrapper nono Backup-rsync-time-backup Time Machine-style backups for Linux and macOS using rsync VS DO Docker Volume Backup Backup tool for Docker volumes to local or remote storage
FeatureBackup wrapper nono Backup-rsync-time-backupDocker Volume Backup
CategoryBackup & RecoveryBackup & Recovery
LicenseMITMPL-2.0
LanguageShellGo
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM32 MB64 MB
Deploymentbinarydocker
GitHub stars★ 3,608★ 3,944
First released20142021
ReplacesTime MachineVeeam

Why pick each one

Choose Backup wrapper nono Backup-rsync-time-backup if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Active community (3.6k GitHub stars)
  • Written in Shell
Backup wrapper nono Backup-rsync-time-backup details

Choose Docker Volume Backup if…

  • Released under the MPL-2.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (3.9k GitHub stars)
Docker Volume Backup details

Frequently asked questions

Is Backup wrapper nono Backup-rsync-time-backup or Docker Volume Backup better?

Neither is universally better. Docker Volume Backup has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Backup wrapper nono Backup-rsync-time-backup and Docker Volume Backup free and open-source?

Yes. Backup wrapper nono Backup-rsync-time-backup is licensed under MIT and Docker Volume Backup under MPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Backup wrapper nono Backup-rsync-time-backup and Docker Volume Backup with Docker?

Backup wrapper nono Backup-rsync-time-backup: check the project docs for container support. Docker Volume Backup: yes.

Related comparisons