Tailscale vs Teleport
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted remote access & vpn options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Tailscale
Zero-config mesh VPN built on WireGuard
VS
Teleport
Identity-aware access for infrastructure
| Feature | Tailscale | Teleport |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Remote Access & VPN | Remote Access & VPN |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Go | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 1,024 MB |
| Deployment | binary, bare-metal | docker, kubernetes, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 34,934 | ★ 20,780 |
| First released | 2019 | 2016 |
| Replaces | ZeroTier | Cisco AnyConnect, AWS Systems Manager |
Why pick each one
Choose Tailscale if…
- Released under the BSD-3-Clause license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Mature project with 34.9k GitHub stars
- Written in Go
Choose Teleport if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
- Mature project with 20.8k GitHub stars
Frequently asked questions
Is Tailscale or Teleport better?
Tailscale is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Teleport if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Tailscale and Teleport free and open-source?
Yes. Tailscale is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and Teleport under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Tailscale and Teleport with Docker?
Tailscale: check the project docs for container support. Teleport: yes.