Syncthing vs XBackBone

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureSyncthingXBackBone
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseMPL-2.0AGPL-3.0
LanguageGoPHP
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM128 MB50 MB
Deploymentdocker, binary, bare-metalbare-metal
GitHub stars★ 87,439★ 1,161
First released20142023
ReplacesDropbox, Resilio SyncWeTransfer

Why pick each one

Choose Syncthing if…

  • No central server needed
  • Very private by design
  • Lightweight and reliable
Syncthing details

Choose XBackBone if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Active community (1.2k GitHub stars)
  • Written in PHP
XBackBone details

Frequently asked questions

Is Syncthing or XBackBone better?

Neither is universally better. Syncthing has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Syncthing and XBackBone free and open-source?

Yes. Syncthing is licensed under MPL-2.0 and XBackBone under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Syncthing and XBackBone with Docker?

Syncthing: yes. XBackBone: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons