Syncthing vs Syncthing-Fork

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureSyncthingSyncthing-Fork
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseMPL-2.0MPL-2.0
LanguageGoJava
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM128 MB128 MB
Deploymentdocker, binary, bare-metalbare-metal, binary
GitHub stars★ 87,439★ 2,534
First released20142017
ReplacesDropbox, Resilio SyncDropbox, Google Drive

Why pick each one

Choose Syncthing if…

  • No central server needed
  • Very private by design
  • Lightweight and reliable
Syncthing details

Choose Syncthing-Fork if…

  • Actively maintained
  • No central server needed
Syncthing-Fork details

Frequently asked questions

Is Syncthing or Syncthing-Fork better?

Neither is universally better. Syncthing has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Syncthing and Syncthing-Fork free and open-source?

Yes. Syncthing is licensed under MPL-2.0 and Syncthing-Fork under MPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Syncthing and Syncthing-Fork with Docker?

Syncthing: yes. Syncthing-Fork: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons