SVG-edit vs Teable

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted office suites options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureSVG-editTeable
CategoryOffice SuitesOffice Suites
LicenseMITAGPL-3.0
LanguageJavaScriptTypeScript
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM50 MB1,024 MB
Deploymentbare-metaldocker, source
GitHub stars★ 7,764★ 21,635
First released20232023
ReplacesAirtable

Why pick each one

Choose SVG-edit if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Mature project with 7.8k GitHub stars
  • Written in JavaScript
SVG-edit details

Choose Teable if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 21.6k GitHub stars
  • Written in TypeScript
Teable details

Frequently asked questions

Is SVG-edit or Teable better?

Neither is universally better. Teable has the larger community, while SVG-edit is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are SVG-edit and Teable free and open-source?

Yes. SVG-edit is licensed under MIT and Teable under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run SVG-edit and Teable with Docker?

SVG-edit: check the project docs for container support. Teable: yes.

Related comparisons