Supabase vs Wasp
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Supabase
Open-source Firebase alternative
VS
Wasp
Declarative full-stack web framework for React and Node
| Feature | Supabase | Wasp |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Self-Hosting Platforms (PaaS) | Developer Tools & Git |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Language | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 4,096 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes | docker, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 107,678 | ★ 18,663 |
| First released | 2020 | 2021 |
| Replaces | Firebase | Firebase |
Why pick each one
Choose Wasp if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 18.7k GitHub stars
- Written in TypeScript
Frequently asked questions
Is Supabase or Wasp better?
Neither is universally better. Supabase has the larger community, while Wasp is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Supabase and Wasp free and open-source?
Yes. Supabase is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Wasp under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Supabase and Wasp with Docker?
Supabase: yes. Wasp: yes.