Strapi vs Wasp

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted developer tools & git options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureStrapiWasp
CategoryDeveloper Tools & GitDeveloper Tools & Git
LicenseMITMIT
LanguageTypeScriptTypeScript
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM1,024 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, kubernetes, binarydocker, source
GitHub stars★ 72,821★ 18,663
First released20152021
ReplacesContentfulFirebase

Why pick each one

Choose Strapi if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 72.8k GitHub stars
Strapi details

Choose Wasp if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 18.7k GitHub stars
  • Written in TypeScript
Wasp details

Frequently asked questions

Is Strapi or Wasp better?

Neither is universally better. Strapi has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Strapi and Wasp free and open-source?

Yes. Strapi is licensed under MIT and Wasp under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Strapi and Wasp with Docker?

Strapi: yes. Wasp: yes.

Related comparisons