Stract vs Typesense
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted search engines options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Stract
Open-source web search engine you can self-host
VS
Typesense
Open-source typo-tolerant search engine optimized for speed
| Feature | Stract | Typesense |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Search Engines | Search Engines |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | Rust | C++ |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 4,096 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary, source | docker, kubernetes, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 2,376 | ★ 26,409 |
| First released | 2023 | 2019 |
| Replaces | Google Search, Bing | Algolia, Elasticsearch |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Stract or Typesense better?
Typesense is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Stract if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Stract and Typesense free and open-source?
Yes. Stract is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Typesense under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Stract and Typesense with Docker?
Stract: yes. Typesense: yes.