Statamic vs Typecho
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Statamic
Laravel-powered flat-file CMS for custom sites
VS
Typecho
Lightweight, fast blogging program
| Feature | Statamic | Typecho |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Content Management Systems | Blogging Platforms |
| License | MIT | GPL-2.0 |
| Language | PHP | PHP |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal, source | bare-metal, docker, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 4,861 | ★ 12,418 |
| First released | 2012 | 2008 |
| Replaces | WordPress, Contentful | WordPress, Blogger |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Statamic or Typecho better?
Typecho is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Statamic if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Statamic and Typecho free and open-source?
Yes. Statamic is licensed under MIT and Typecho under GPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Statamic and Typecho with Docker?
Statamic: yes. Typecho: yes.