spoo.me vs Reduced.to

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted url shorteners options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
Featurespoo.meReduced.to
CategoryURL ShortenersURL Shorteners
LicenseMITMIT
LanguagePythonTypeScript
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM256 MB1,024 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metaldocker
GitHub stars★ 240★ 705
First released20232022
ReplacesBitly, CuttlyBitly, Rebrandly

Why pick each one

Choose spoo.me if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Written in Python
spoo.me details

Choose Reduced.to if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Written in TypeScript
Reduced.to details

Frequently asked questions

Is spoo.me or Reduced.to better?

Neither is universally better. Reduced.to has the larger community, while spoo.me is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are spoo.me and Reduced.to free and open-source?

Yes. spoo.me is licensed under MIT and Reduced.to under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run spoo.me and Reduced.to with Docker?

spoo.me: yes. Reduced.to: yes.

Related comparisons