Sonixd vs SRS

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted media servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureSonixdSRS
CategoryMedia ServersMedia Servers
LicenseAGPL-3.0MIT
LanguageTypeScriptC++
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM256 MB512 MB
Deploymentbare-metaldocker
GitHub stars★ 1,919★ 29,105
First released20212025
ReplacesSpotify

Why pick each one

Choose Sonixd if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Active community (1.9k GitHub stars)
  • Written in TypeScript
Sonixd details

Choose SRS if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 29.1k GitHub stars
  • Written in C++
SRS details

Frequently asked questions

Is Sonixd or SRS better?

Neither is universally better. SRS has the larger community, while Sonixd is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Sonixd and SRS free and open-source?

Yes. Sonixd is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and SRS under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Sonixd and SRS with Docker?

Sonixd: check the project docs for container support. SRS: yes.

Related comparisons