Sonarr vs Stash
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted media servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Sonarr
Series collection manager for Usenet and BitTorrent users
VS
Stash
Self-hosted media organizer and server
| Feature | Sonarr | Stash |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Media Servers | Media Servers |
| License | GPL-3.0-only | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | C# | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 50 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 15,005 | ★ 12,802 |
| First released | 2023 | 2019 |
| Replaces | — | Plex |
Why pick each one
Choose Sonarr if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0-only license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Mature project with 15k GitHub stars
- Written in C#
Frequently asked questions
Is Sonarr or Stash better?
Neither is universally better. Sonarr has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Sonarr and Stash free and open-source?
Yes. Sonarr is licensed under GPL-3.0-only and Stash under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Sonarr and Stash with Docker?
Sonarr: check the project docs for container support. Stash: yes.