Solidtime vs FocusTime Tracker

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted time tracking options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureSolidtimeFocusTime Tracker
CategoryTime TrackingTime Tracking
LicenseAGPL-3.0MIT
LanguagePHPPython
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM512 MB64 MB
Deploymentdocker, sourcebinary, source
GitHub stars★ 8,846★ 2,535
First released20242015
ReplacesToggl, Clockify, HarvestToggl, Harvest

Why pick each one

Choose Solidtime if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 8.8k GitHub stars
  • Written in PHP
Solidtime details

Choose FocusTime Tracker if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Active community (2.5k GitHub stars)
  • Written in Python
FocusTime Tracker details

Frequently asked questions

Is Solidtime or FocusTime Tracker better?

Neither is universally better. Solidtime has the larger community, while FocusTime Tracker is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Solidtime and FocusTime Tracker free and open-source?

Yes. Solidtime is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and FocusTime Tracker under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Solidtime and FocusTime Tracker with Docker?

Solidtime: yes. FocusTime Tracker: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons