Snapweb vs SRS

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted media servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureSnapwebSRS
CategoryMedia ServersMedia Servers
LicenseGPL-3.0MIT
LanguageTypeScriptC++
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM64 MB512 MB
Deploymentbare-metal, sourcedocker
GitHub stars★ 145★ 29,105
First released20202025
ReplacesSonos

Why pick each one

Choose Snapweb if…

  • No app install needed
  • Tight Snapcast integration
Snapweb details

Choose SRS if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 29.1k GitHub stars
  • Written in C++
SRS details

Frequently asked questions

Is Snapweb or SRS better?

Neither is universally better. SRS has the larger community, while Snapweb is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Snapweb and SRS free and open-source?

Yes. Snapweb is licensed under GPL-3.0 and SRS under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Snapweb and SRS with Docker?

Snapweb: check the project docs for container support. SRS: yes.

Related comparisons