Snapcast vs SRS

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted media servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureSnapcastSRS
CategoryMedia ServersMedia Servers
LicenseGPL-3.0MIT
LanguageC++C++
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM64 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metaldocker
GitHub stars★ 7,801★ 29,105
First released20142025
ReplacesSonos

Why pick each one

Choose Snapcast if…

  • Excellent sync accuracy
  • Runs on tiny devices
Snapcast details

Choose SRS if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 29.1k GitHub stars
  • Written in C++
SRS details

Frequently asked questions

Is Snapcast or SRS better?

Neither is universally better. SRS has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Snapcast and SRS free and open-source?

Yes. Snapcast is licensed under GPL-3.0 and SRS under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Snapcast and SRS with Docker?

Snapcast: yes. SRS: yes.

Related comparisons