Apache SkyWalking vs Zipkin

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureApache SkyWalkingZipkin
CategoryMonitoring & StatusMonitoring & Status
LicenseApache-2.0Apache-2.0
LanguageJavaJava
Setup difficultyHardMedium
Min. RAM2,048 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, kubernetes, helmdocker, binary
GitHub stars★ 24,915★ 17,452
First released20152015
ReplacesNew Relic, DatadogDatadog APM

Why pick each one

Choose Apache SkyWalking if…

  • Full observability suite
  • Strong Apache governance
Apache SkyWalking details

Choose Zipkin if…

  • Simple to run
  • Long-established project
Zipkin details

Frequently asked questions

Is Apache SkyWalking or Zipkin better?

Neither is universally better. Apache SkyWalking has the larger community, while Zipkin is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Apache SkyWalking and Zipkin free and open-source?

Yes. Apache SkyWalking is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Zipkin under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Apache SkyWalking and Zipkin with Docker?

Apache SkyWalking: yes. Zipkin: yes.

Related comparisons