Apache SkyWalking vs Cstate
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Apache SkyWalking
APM and observability for cloud-native architectures
VS
Cstate
Static status page based on Hugo and Markdown
| Feature | Apache SkyWalking | Cstate |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Monitoring & Status | Monitoring & Status |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Language | Java | HTML |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 2,048 MB | 32 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes, helm | one-click, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 24,915 | ★ 2,894 |
| First released | 2015 | 2018 |
| Replaces | New Relic, Datadog | Statuspage |
Why pick each one
Choose Apache SkyWalking if…
- Full observability suite
- Strong Apache governance
Frequently asked questions
Is Apache SkyWalking or Cstate better?
Neither is universally better. Apache SkyWalking has the larger community, while Cstate is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Apache SkyWalking and Cstate free and open-source?
Yes. Apache SkyWalking is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Cstate under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Apache SkyWalking and Cstate with Docker?
Apache SkyWalking: yes. Cstate: check the project docs for container support.