Apache SkyWalking vs Vector

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureApache SkyWalkingVector
CategoryMonitoring & StatusMonitoring & Status
LicenseApache-2.0MPL-2.0
LanguageJavaRust
Setup difficultyHardMedium
Min. RAM2,048 MB64 MB
Deploymentdocker, kubernetes, helmdocker, kubernetes, binary
GitHub stars★ 24,915★ 22,315
First released20152019
ReplacesNew Relic, DatadogLogstash, Fluentd

Why pick each one

Choose Apache SkyWalking if…

  • Full observability suite
  • Strong Apache governance
Apache SkyWalking details

Choose Vector if…

  • Extremely fast
  • Single static binary
Vector details

Frequently asked questions

Is Apache SkyWalking or Vector better?

Neither is universally better. Apache SkyWalking has the larger community, while Vector is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Apache SkyWalking and Vector free and open-source?

Yes. Apache SkyWalking is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Vector under MPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Apache SkyWalking and Vector with Docker?

Apache SkyWalking: yes. Vector: yes.

Related comparisons