Apache SkyWalking vs Statup Status
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Apache SkyWalking
APM and observability for cloud-native architectures
VS
Statup Status
Lightweight uptime monitoring with a public status page
| Feature | Apache SkyWalking | Statup Status |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Monitoring & Status | Monitoring & Status |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | Java | Vue |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 2,048 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes, helm | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 24,915 | ★ 7,292 |
| First released | 2015 | 2018 |
| Replaces | New Relic, Datadog | StatusPage, UptimeRobot |
Why pick each one
Choose Apache SkyWalking if…
- Full observability suite
- Strong Apache governance
Frequently asked questions
Is Apache SkyWalking or Statup Status better?
Neither is universally better. Apache SkyWalking has the larger community, while Statup Status is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Apache SkyWalking and Statup Status free and open-source?
Yes. Apache SkyWalking is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Statup Status under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Apache SkyWalking and Statup Status with Docker?
Apache SkyWalking: yes. Statup Status: yes.