Apache SkyWalking vs Upptime

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureApache SkyWalkingUpptime
CategoryMonitoring & StatusMonitoring & Status
LicenseApache-2.0MIT
LanguageJavaMarkdown
Setup difficultyHardEasy
Min. RAM2,048 MB64 MB
Deploymentdocker, kubernetes, helmone-click, source
GitHub stars★ 24,915★ 17,114
First released20152020
ReplacesNew Relic, DatadogStatuspage, Pingdom

Why pick each one

Choose Apache SkyWalking if…

  • Full observability suite
  • Strong Apache governance
Apache SkyWalking details

Choose Upptime if…

  • Completely free hosting
  • Zero infrastructure
Upptime details

Frequently asked questions

Is Apache SkyWalking or Upptime better?

Neither is universally better. Apache SkyWalking has the larger community, while Upptime is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Apache SkyWalking and Upptime free and open-source?

Yes. Apache SkyWalking is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Upptime under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Apache SkyWalking and Upptime with Docker?

Apache SkyWalking: yes. Upptime: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons