Apache SkyWalking vs Beszel Hub
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Apache SkyWalking
APM and observability for cloud-native architectures
VS
Beszel Hub
Lightweight server resource monitoring agent network
| Feature | Apache SkyWalking | Beszel Hub |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Monitoring & Status | Monitoring & Status |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Java | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 2,048 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes, helm | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 24,915 | ★ 8,946 |
| First released | 2015 | 2023 |
| Replaces | New Relic, Datadog | Pingdom, Checkly |
Why pick each one
Choose Apache SkyWalking if…
- Full observability suite
- Strong Apache governance
Frequently asked questions
Is Apache SkyWalking or Beszel Hub better?
Neither is universally better. Apache SkyWalking has the larger community, while Beszel Hub is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Apache SkyWalking and Beszel Hub free and open-source?
Yes. Apache SkyWalking is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Beszel Hub under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Apache SkyWalking and Beszel Hub with Docker?
Apache SkyWalking: yes. Beszel Hub: yes.
Related comparisons
- Apache SkyWalking vs Pinpoint APM
- Apache SkyWalking vs Alertmanager
- Apache SkyWalking vs Apache Exporter
- Apache SkyWalking vs Beszel
- Beszel Hub vs Beszel
- Apache SkyWalking vs Bugsink
- Apache SkyWalking vs Cacti
- Apache SkyWalking vs cAdvisor
- Apache SkyWalking vs CasaOS
- Apache SkyWalking vs Lunalytics
- Beszel Hub vs Lunalytics