Skyvern vs ToolJet
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted automation & workflows options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Skyvern
Automate browser workflows with LLMs and computer vision
VS
ToolJet
Low-code platform for building and automating business tools
| Feature | Skyvern | ToolJet |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Automation & Workflows | Automation & Workflows |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Python | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 4,096 MB | 2,048 MB |
| Deployment | docker | docker, kubernetes, helm |
| GitHub stars | ★ 22,708 | ★ 38,306 |
| First released | 2024 | 2021 |
| Replaces | UiPath, Zapier | Retool, Microsoft Power Apps |
Why pick each one
Choose Skyvern if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 22.7k GitHub stars
- Written in Python
Frequently asked questions
Is Skyvern or ToolJet better?
Neither is universally better. ToolJet has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Skyvern and ToolJet free and open-source?
Yes. Skyvern is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and ToolJet under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Skyvern and ToolJet with Docker?
Skyvern: yes. ToolJet: yes.