SimpleX Chat vs Yeti-Switch
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted chat & communication options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
SimpleX Chat
Private messenger without any user identifiers
VS
Yeti-Switch
Transit class4 softswitch(SBC) with integrated billing and routing
| Feature | SimpleX Chat | Yeti-Switch |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Chat & Communication | Chat & Communication |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-2.0 |
| Language | Haskell | C++ |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary, source | bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 19,211 | — |
| First released | 2021 | 2020 |
| Replaces | Signal, WhatsApp, Telegram | — |
Why pick each one
Choose Yeti-Switch if…
- Released under the GPL-2.0 license
- Written in C++
- Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is SimpleX Chat or Yeti-Switch better?
Neither is universally better. SimpleX Chat has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are SimpleX Chat and Yeti-Switch free and open-source?
Yes. SimpleX Chat is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Yeti-Switch under GPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run SimpleX Chat and Yeti-Switch with Docker?
SimpleX Chat: yes. Yeti-Switch: check the project docs for container support.