SimpleX Chat vs Slixmpp
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted chat & communication options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
SimpleX Chat
Private messenger without any user identifiers
VS
Slixmpp
XMPP library for building bots and chat extensions
| Feature | SimpleX Chat | Slixmpp |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Chat & Communication | Chat & Communication |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | Haskell | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary, source | source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 19,211 | ★ 300 |
| First released | 2021 | 2014 |
| Replaces | Signal, WhatsApp, Telegram | Slack apps |
Why pick each one
Choose Slixmpp if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Written in Python
- Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is SimpleX Chat or Slixmpp better?
Neither is universally better. SimpleX Chat has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are SimpleX Chat and Slixmpp free and open-source?
Yes. SimpleX Chat is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Slixmpp under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run SimpleX Chat and Slixmpp with Docker?
SimpleX Chat: yes. Slixmpp: check the project docs for container support.