Sickchill vs SRS

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted media servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureSickchillSRS
CategoryMedia ServersMedia Servers
LicensefreeMIT
LanguageC++
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM512 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, one-clickdocker
GitHub stars★ 29,105
First released20222025
Replaces

Why pick each one

Choose Sickchill if…

  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • One-click install on common self-host platforms
  • Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Sickchill details

Choose SRS if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 29.1k GitHub stars
  • Written in C++
SRS details

Frequently asked questions

Is Sickchill or SRS better?

Neither is universally better. SRS has the larger community, while Sickchill is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Sickchill and SRS free and open-source?

Yes. Sickchill is licensed under free and SRS under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Sickchill and SRS with Docker?

Sickchill: yes. SRS: yes.

Related comparisons