Shuttlecraft vs snac
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Shuttlecraft
Single-user IndieWeb blog with ActivityPub support
VS
snac
Minimalist ActivityPub server in C
| Feature | Shuttlecraft | snac |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Blogging Platforms | Social Networks |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | JavaScript | C |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | docker, source | binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 271 | ★ 900 |
| First released | 2023 | 2022 |
| Replaces | Twitter, Mastodon | Twitter, Mastodon |
Why pick each one
Choose Shuttlecraft if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in JavaScript
- Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Choose snac if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Written in C
- Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Shuttlecraft or snac better?
Neither is universally better. snac has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Shuttlecraft and snac free and open-source?
Yes. Shuttlecraft is licensed under MIT and snac under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Shuttlecraft and snac with Docker?
Shuttlecraft: yes. snac: check the project docs for container support.