Shlink Web Client vs Reduced.to
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted url shorteners options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Shlink Web Client
Web dashboard for managing Shlink instances
VS
Reduced.to
Open-source modern URL shortener and link management
| Feature | Shlink Web Client | Reduced.to |
|---|---|---|
| Category | URL Shorteners | URL Shorteners |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 1,024 MB |
| Deployment | docker | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 391 | ★ 705 |
| First released | 2018 | 2022 |
| Replaces | Bitly | Bitly, Rebrandly |
Why pick each one
Choose Shlink Web Client if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in TypeScript
Choose Reduced.to if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in TypeScript
Frequently asked questions
Is Shlink Web Client or Reduced.to better?
Neither is universally better. Reduced.to has the larger community, while Shlink Web Client is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Shlink Web Client and Reduced.to free and open-source?
Yes. Shlink Web Client is licensed under MIT and Reduced.to under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Shlink Web Client and Reduced.to with Docker?
Shlink Web Client: yes. Reduced.to: yes.