SHSelfHostIndex

ConvertX vs Carbone Document Engine

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted office suites options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
CO ConvertX Self-hosted online file conversion service VS CA Carbone Document Engine Template-based report and document generator
FeatureConvertXCarbone Document Engine
CategoryOffice SuitesOffice Suites
LicenseAGPL-3.0Apache-2.0
LanguageTypeScriptJavaScript
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM512 MB512 MB
Deploymentdockerdocker, source
GitHub stars★ 18,354★ 2,087
First released20242015
ReplacesCloudConvert, ZamzarDocRaptor, Adobe PDF Services

Why pick each one

Choose ConvertX if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 18.4k GitHub stars
ConvertX details

Choose Carbone Document Engine if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (2.1k GitHub stars)
  • Written in JavaScript
Carbone Document Engine details

Frequently asked questions

Is ConvertX or Carbone Document Engine better?

ConvertX is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Carbone Document Engine if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are ConvertX and Carbone Document Engine free and open-source?

Yes. ConvertX is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Carbone Document Engine under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run ConvertX and Carbone Document Engine with Docker?

ConvertX: yes. Carbone Document Engine: yes.

Related comparisons