FreeRADIUS vs ZITADEL
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted identity & sso options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
FreeRADIUS
High-performance open-source RADIUS server
VS
ZITADEL
Cloud-native identity infrastructure with multi-tenancy built in
| Feature | FreeRADIUS | ZITADEL |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Identity & SSO | Identity & SSO |
| License | GPL-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | C | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal, source, docker | docker, kubernetes, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 2,569 | ★ 14,671 |
| First released | 1999 | 2020 |
| Replaces | Cisco ISE | Auth0, Okta, Firebase Auth |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is FreeRADIUS or ZITADEL better?
ZITADEL is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider FreeRADIUS if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are FreeRADIUS and ZITADEL free and open-source?
Yes. FreeRADIUS is licensed under GPL-2.0 and ZITADEL under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run FreeRADIUS and ZITADEL with Docker?
FreeRADIUS: yes. ZITADEL: yes.